Thomas S.

It was during the spread of communism throughout Eastern Europe in the early 20th Century that Hungary first fell to the reds. The Hungarian Soviet Republic was established by Bela Kun in the aftermath of the First World War, with support from the Bolsheviks in Moscow. His dictatorship was short-lived however, after an uprising of the people wrought a vengeance upon his regime.

According to commentators of the era, the catalyst for counter-revolution against Kun’s regime was triggered by parents who were outraged at the sexualisation of the curriculum in the communist-run schools. In other words, the sexualisation of children by the state which is occurring today, is nothing new. Indeed, for those who are well acquainted with history, much of what is happening today is simply a remodelling of the same blueprint that has been implemented before.

The demoralisation of a society is a necessary stage in any communist revolution, as has been elaborated upon by KGB defector, Yuri Bezmenov. The sexualisation of children has been a particularly nasty element of the demoralisation of Western nations. After all, for a society to surrender the natural instinct to protect its young is as sure a signal as any that its moral foundations have been weakened to the extent that the public will accept nearly anything.

As such, the fact that parents today are yet to light their torches and reach for their pitchforks while state-sponsored crimes against children go unpunished, does not bode well for the future of Western civilisation. Rather, it speaks volumes about the extent to which our society has already been corrupted and demoralised over the course of several generations.

Indeed, the promotion of degeneracy featured amongst the ’45 Declared Goals for the Communist Takeover of America’ which were read out by Congressman Albert Herlong, Junior in 1963 to the United States Congress. More than half a century later, many of these objectives have already been thoroughly implemented, not only in the United States, but throughout much of the Western world.

Among the goals which were read by the congressman into the record were the detailed objectives for the demoralisation of America, including the intentions to:

Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”

As such, it should come as no surprise to any of us to find the liberal agenda for the sexualisation of youth being thrust upon society as part of the attempted Western Cultural Revolution. Indeed, social engineering has successfully convinced millions of young people that sexual confusion is not only fashionable, but that it is one of the most important social issues of our time.

According to a report issued by the CDC earlier this year, more than a quarter of high school students in the United States now identify as belonging somewhere on the LGBT spectrum. Meanwhile, Brown University in Rhode Island has reported that 38% of its students now identify as LGBT, compared with only 14% in 2010.

Such abnormally high rates of confusion in young people are not naturally occurring, and it certainly warrants further investigation. Politics aside, such a phenomenon would not be ignored if it were observed on such a scale in any species other than our own.

After all, the repercussions for the continuity of the species, particularly when considering the irreversibility of many gender-affirming surgeries associated with transgenderism, are potentially catastrophic. As young people are yet to develop the prefrontal cortex in the brain, many are simply unable to contemplate the long-term consequences of gender-affirming surgical interventions. And, most importantly, research suggests that many LGBT youth are simply victims of propaganda who would otherwise be living normal lives without such complications.

According to political scientist Eric Kaufman, there is a significant inconsistency between identification and behavioural trends associated with the LGBT demographic. Kaufman has commented that:

What we find instead is that identity is rising much faster than behaviour, indicating that people with occasional rather than sustained feelings of attraction to the [same] sex are increasingly identifying as LGBT.

Kaufman, who is a researcher at the Centre for the Study of Partisanship and Ideology, has noted in a report for the CSPI that of an 11-point increase in LGBT identity between 2008 and 2021 among Americans under thirty years old, only around 4 points correlate to an increase in corresponding behaviour. According to the report:

The majority of the increase in LGBT identity can be traced to how those who only engage in heterosexual behaviour describe themselves.

Kaufman’s research suggests that much of what is attributed to the LGBT phenomenon may in fact be a social or political trend, rather than a legitimate and cognizant expression of dysphoria or same-sex attraction. Interestingly, bisexuality is often the most common category of LGBT and, when matched with the lack of behavioral consistency to legitimise claimed identification, casts further doubt over LGBT as a genuine phenomenon.

The CSPI report also notes that:

Very liberal ideology is associated with identifying as LGBT among those with heterosexual behaviour, especially women. It seems that an underlying psychological disposition is inclining people with heterosexual behaviour to identify both as LGBT and very liberal.

Critics of the LGBT movement have even gone so far as to describe the phenomenon as a ‘social contagion’. Unlike other liberal trends, however, the push for gender-affirming medical interventions associated with the movement, which the pharmaceutical industry stands to profit tremendously from, is putting young people at risk of life-long harm that they are likely to come to regret.

Tragically, many of these young people, whether they be minors or young adults, who are being swept along by the LGBT movement, are already counted amongst the vulnerable, with Kaufman’s report highlighting that:

Very liberal ideology and LGBT identification are associated with anxiety and depression in young people. Very liberal young Americans are twice as likely as others to experience these problems. 27% of young Americans with anxiety or depression were LGBT in 2021.

According to Kaufman:

Among young people, mental health problems, liberal ideology, and LGBT identity are strongly correlated.

Indeed, according to a National Survey on LGBTQ Youth Mental Health conducted by American-based The Trevor Project in 2022: “45% of LGBTQ youth seriously considered attempting suicide in the past year”.

The tendency for self-harm associated with those on the LGBT spectrum certainly raises questions about the ethics of promoting irreversible gender-affirming surgeries and medical treatments to at-risk youth, as is being done today.

Psychologists and other health practitioners are now also at risk themselves of malpractice if they offer potential solutions to LGBT youth, other than those that affirm what is considered ‘politically acceptable’. And while ‘conversion therapy’ has been given a bad name by LGBT activists and mainstream media, there are a significant number of youth who are being deliberately confused and who could stand to benefit from qualified and ethical health professionals, able to offer alternative solutions.

According to submissions made to the ‘Conversion Practices Prohibition Bill’, which prescribes significant jail terms for those offering such services for LGBT youth:

Submitters who oppose the maximum penalty were concerned that health professionals, such as counsellors, would not feel able to work for fear of breaking the law.

The hypocrisy of the New Zealand government for simultaneously outlawing conversion therapy practices for minors under the age of eighteen, while themselves propagandising and confusing young people about sexuality is more than ironic. Canada under the Trudeau regime, however, has taken this a step further and has outlawed any form of conversion therapy – regardless of a patient’s age or consent.

Not only is this inconsistent with the rights and freedoms of the individual, but it also potentially places many who may already be considered vulnerable at risk, without the privilege of choice regarding their own approach to healthcare.

If the proliferation of eating disorders was politically expedient, would we likewise see the promotion of anorexia and bulimia by the state? In much the same way that eating serves a biological function and eating abnormalities may rightly be referred to as a disorder rather than an expression of diversity, so, similarly, does sexuality serve a function. As such, is it right to outlaw professional healthcare for those seeking to resolve what is in both cases, so often associated with trauma?

Furthermore, it is not only health practitioners who face criminal liability for offering pathways for young people who seek to address the underlying causes of life’s complexities. Parents, too, are now finding that their parental rights are also being incurred upon by the state in this regard.

Take Canadian father Rob Hoogland for example, who was sentenced to six months in jail for challenging court orders in an attempt to protect his daughter from transgender indoctrination and grooming which had occurred at school without his knowledge. The child, who also reportedly had cognitive challenges, had already been ‘socially transitioned’ to live life as a male while at school, without parental consent.

Totalitarian regimes have always targeted the youth and tragically, despite Hoogland’s efforts to rescue his daughter from the butchers, he was informed that hospital staff would be proceeding with gender affirming medical treatment for his fourteen year old daughter and that under the B.C. Infants Act, parental consent was not required.

Hoogland was convicted in 2019 by Judge Francesca Marzari of ‘family violence’ for using female pronouns in relation to his daughter. The judge also authorised police to arrest Hoogland if he continued to misgender his child.

While there has always been a legitimate minority of people in society who do not fit conventional gender norms, the highly politicised LGBT movement does not advocate for them. Rather, the LGBT movement is simply an arm attached to an iron fist with all the trappings of the red revolutions we have seen in the past.

Find this article on Substack.